Cloning should not be legalized

It is not yet certain that such potential advances will actually occur. Give it time and let the idea of cloning will become norm. In animal cloning, the possibility of success is very small and wastes a lot of money, but saving the life of the one you love is priceless. And just as importantly, we can inform those who are interested in cloning themselves, or a relative, or a friend, about what cloning actually is and clear up any misconceptions they might have about the procedure.

But anti-rejection drugs often have severe side effects. There are even provisions to have checks and balances, should the situation suggest the parent s may not be guided by normal parental instincts.

Human Cloning Prohibition Act of Let's not let the ignorance of our politicians get in the way of scientific advances for not only our generation but for the future as well. People and the laws of society would adjust in time, just as we have for artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization.

There is no opportunity to quit the experiment if the subject so decides. Artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, drugs to stimulate ovulation, techniques of micro sperm extraction and direct injection into an ovum, and other techniques have been introduced successfully to treat human infertility.

How would we describe their relationship. Cloned cells could be used to create replacement tissue for diseased hearts, pancreatic cells for diabetics, treatments for neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, nerve cells for victims of spinal cord injuries, and skin cells for burn victims.

This is where the offensive factor mentioned earlier comes in. Thus would it be unethical for the couple instead to clone their dying child in order to use the marrow from the clone—who necessarily will be a perfect match—to save their dying child.

By eating the fruit, both Adam and Eve suddenly became aware of their surroundings; they had acquired new knowledge. The next step, like the Elohim do with their 25, years of scientific advance, will be to directly clone an adult person without having to go through the growth process and to transfer memory and personality in this person.

The doctor then would remove the egg's nucleus, which only would have 23 chromosomes, half the necessary amount for human reproduction, and replace it with the nucleus of another cell—a somatic cell, which would have a full complement of 46 chromosomes.

I wish they would research the issue for once, and stop commenting on sensitive issues without full knowledge.

Finally, cloning raises the specter of eugenics, which many associate with Nazi Germany and those who promote beliefs in racial supremacy. I believe that accepting certain limits on our actions, our humanity, would perhaps ironically empower us in the long run.

It will not be necessary to clone an individual's own tissue via SCNT. In FebruaryDolly sheep died prematurely at the age of 6 with severe lung disease and also suffered from arthritis at a very early age, probably as a result of cloning. But by banning human cloning, stops further research where it stops the help of saving lives.

Some evidence of genetic instability has been identified in mice clones and in cellular processes with cognate human processes. Despite confusion about scientific and technical issues, there is widespread public awareness of predictions that human cloning and stem cell research could provide treatments and cures for many diseases, if scientists are allowed the freedom to pursue all promising pathways.

As one scientist from Johns Hopkins stated in his recent testimony before the Senate, research cloning should be called "nuclear transplantation," not "cloning. The bill does not ban scientifically and medically useful cloning practices such as the cloning of DNA fragments molecular cloningthe duplication of tissue or cells in culture cell cloningor whole-organism or embryo cloning of non-human animals.

In addition to the above ethical considerations, research cloning should be forbidden because it increases the likelihood of reproductive cloning. Through cloning, any body cell can be used to conceive a child, no sperm or egg is needed. Livestock with specially prized traits, laboratory animals with unique characteristics, the endangered species whose existence is imperiled—if our cloning experiments fail or turn out to have unacceptable consequences, corrections are possible and unwanted outcomes can be disposed of.

It's not magic, and frankly I'm quite glad about that. It is true that no human gets to choose to be born or to whom or under what circumstances. However to clone a whole human is wrong and indeed "playing God".

Diversity could be lost if parents would choose similar patterns in selecting the genetic material for their children. Face facts - we really are all just complex chemical reactions. However, as evidenced in Senator Daschle's move to delay consideration of H. In my opinion it would be too dangerous to legalise human cloning.

He paints a picture of a future where people have clones of themselves, to provide spare parts if, say, you happen to loose a limb, or an eye, or need a new heart. It is nonsensical to believe that we can ban one without also banning the other.

Robert Bahrani, UK As a biologist I totally agree with the principles of cloning and the uses of the method. Indeed, throughout history, we can find many examples where a society initially condemned, or even was repulsed, by a new scientific practice or idea, although it would later come to accept and even embrace it.

Should human cloning be legalized

No, sorry this is a mistake. What is evident, however, is that if human cloning is not technologically feasible now, it certainly is theoretically possible, and, once the procedures are refined, likely will occur soon.

Bevor Sie fortfahren...

No matter where the somatic cells, however transformed and primed for therapeutic application, are stored, there are problems of availability at the point of need. Human cloning is possible but unlawful in most countries. We discuss the pros and cons of genetic engineering and cloning, and whether it should be legal.

This is your opportunity to convince other people to support or oppose to human cloning. Jul 21,  · Nope, it should not be legalized.

It has quite a number of ethical implications. Perhaps "organ" cloning would make better sense for the sake of medical treatments. Feb 26,  · Best Answer: no it should not, as it is morally reprehensable.

stem cell research is one thing as it is taking undifferentaited cells and turning them into usefull cells (such as the latest breakthorugh in the possible cure fro diabetes mellitus) where stem cells have been turned into pancreatic cells that produce insulin.

now this as a biologist i totally agree with but human cloning Status: Resolved. Cloning is Good for life. The practice of cloning can be used to benefit society and therefore should be legalized.

Ever since the cloning of the first adult sheep, Dolly, the idea of cloning has become a major issue and the subject of many debates.

"Human and Animal Cloning Should Be Legal" We are making technological and medicinal advances very rapidly in today's society.

We have found cures for diseases we never thought could possibly be cured, and it seems that we will be living forever if we keep it up. Article shared by. Cloning humans has recently become a possibility that seems much more feasible today than it was twenty years ago.

Cloning is a method that involves the production of a group of cells or organisms that all derive from a single individual.

Cloning should not be legalized
Rated 4/5 based on 23 review
Should Cloning be legalized by chanel richardson on Prezi